The immediate question of gender in the use of the language should linger with you as we contemplate this. What is hu(man)? What is a person? What is dasein? As the Heideger the philosopher who would go on to embrace fascism would ask. We see the dual problem of supremacy of race and supremacy of gender in asking this question through history. Built from the preconceived biases that we function assuming to be the normative objective unbiased. We must confront the reality that positionality has always directed the bias in this. Humanity is separate in this, from other life and the wider world in which we exist. Nutrients, minerals, water, information, and dogma flow into the being of a single instance of dasein, person, human or man. These flows all construct a given instance both materially and ideologically. Dasein was not that constraint of man though, it is the being of it all which has been debated since antiquity which the intersubjective has formed some agreement upon in various cultural hegemonies over time. Dasein will likely always carry the burden of the Nazis as it came from a Nazi.
Does the ideological flow matter any from that which is external to the single instance of man? As the ideology, religion, science, philosophy, mathematics and understanding of self only exists within a given instance (being, dasein). It becomes unified in the interplay of ideas that are shared and the intersubjective agreement becomes a formal stance classified according to a beaurovariance which has been constructed to comprehend the external.
Continue reading